<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InDenverTimes.com Launched: How to Use Twitter to Generate Buzz and Land Subscribers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Growing Your Business with Local Search, Social Media and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-17752</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/?p=849#comment-17752</guid>
		<description>Adam, you&#039;re right. According to the folks at &lt;a href=&quot;http://InDenverTimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;InDenverTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;, the twitter address was snatched up before they had a chance to register it. They&#039;ve asked @indenvertimes if he (or she) would be willing to give it up but they haven&#039;t had a response yet. Hopefully it&#039;s not some mercenary out to make a quick buck. In the meantime, you&#039;re absolutely right, they have registered @indt so you can follow them there at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/indt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.twitter.com/indt&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, you&#39;re right. According to the folks at <a href="http://InDenverTimes.com" rel="nofollow">InDenverTimes.com</a>, the twitter address was snatched up before they had a chance to register it. They&#39;ve asked @indenvertimes if he (or she) would be willing to give it up but they haven&#39;t had a response yet. Hopefully it&#39;s not some mercenary out to make a quick buck. In the meantime, you&#39;re absolutely right, they have registered @indt so you can follow them there at <a href="http://www.twitter.com/indt" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/indt</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-13862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/?p=849#comment-13862</guid>
		<description>Thanks Corey, it&#039;s an interesting project and one that I hope succeeds otherwise local newspapers go the way of local radio; it disappears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Corey, it&#8217;s an interesting project and one that I hope succeeds otherwise local newspapers go the way of local radio; it disappears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-13833</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/?p=849#comment-13833</guid>
		<description>Axel,

Thanks for the thoughtful analysis of an industry in turmoil. You make great points unfortunately it also goes to show the proof of the old maxim that hindsight is 20/20. I&#039;m not an industry expert but I think that what also happened was the conglomeration of newspapers. They became just another branch office and not the locally owned, locally nurtured, locally invested institution of yesterday but just another corporate outpost - a vehicle to drive revenue through, as you state, an advertising dependent business model. So when a better way came along first with Monster.com and others encroaching on want ads and then craigslist.org and autotrader.com taking their classified ad revenue their model began to crumble.

It&#039;s not that they didn&#039;t have a business model but rather that they didn&#039;t change their business model in the face of rapid change. 

Hopefully www.InsideDenverTimes.com and the www.SeattlePI.com will find a new way to reinvent professional print journalism, digitally.

Thanks,

Tom
@tomjgray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axel,</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughtful analysis of an industry in turmoil. You make great points unfortunately it also goes to show the proof of the old maxim that hindsight is 20/20. I&#8217;m not an industry expert but I think that what also happened was the conglomeration of newspapers. They became just another branch office and not the locally owned, locally nurtured, locally invested institution of yesterday but just another corporate outpost &#8211; a vehicle to drive revenue through, as you state, an advertising dependent business model. So when a better way came along first with Monster.com and others encroaching on want ads and then craigslist.org and autotrader.com taking their classified ad revenue their model began to crumble.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that they didn&#8217;t have a business model but rather that they didn&#8217;t change their business model in the face of rapid change. </p>
<p>Hopefully <a href="http://www.InsideDenverTimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.InsideDenverTimes.com</a> and the <a href="http://www.SeattlePI.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SeattlePI.com</a> will find a new way to reinvent professional print journalism, digitally.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tom<br />
@tomjgray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Schultze</title>
		<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-13828</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Schultze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/?p=849#comment-13828</guid>
		<description>Tom,
if you like, connect me with the group. We are currently working on a business plan for another troubled news paper. 

 As sad as it is, industrial media killed itself. It is NOT the Internet that killed publishers it is the change of their business model from independent content to advertising.

A publisher used to make money by providing a given audience latest news, well researched and easy to consume. Readers paid for the news and publishers made a profit by balancing cost of news gathering and distribution with newspaper revenue. Rather simple model.

In the 70s a new business model entered the publishing industry. Advertising. While the New York Times once stated that they will never have adds... 20 years later the revenue model for the entire industry was advertising. Charging for the newspaper had nothing to do with revenue but exclusively with the fact that the papers had to report the number of sold circulation to the advertisers.

Then the Internet came to life publishers had a gigantic opportunity: a) The news could reach the subscriber even faster and b) the cost of distribution could go way down at the same time. So if news gathering, journalistic preparation and distribution would be the purpose of a publisher, The Internat would have been a blessing. But at that time publishing wasn&#039;t about news distribution anymore but about advertising distribution. And the new advertising model wasn&#039;t too clear to the printing industry.

And as publishers didn&#039;t really know what their business model is, advertisers went directly to the Internet - not needing print anymore and the chewed out news world is going out of business.Well - almost. There are new magazines and some news papers who get this and they are still somewhat alive.

But our world is more than ever thirsty for news, information and updates. All the publishing industry has to do, is to understand that new world, it&#039;s dynamics and its most likely development in the future. A new model is in the works - happy to help. 

@AxelS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
if you like, connect me with the group. We are currently working on a business plan for another troubled news paper. </p>
<p> As sad as it is, industrial media killed itself. It is NOT the Internet that killed publishers it is the change of their business model from independent content to advertising.</p>
<p>A publisher used to make money by providing a given audience latest news, well researched and easy to consume. Readers paid for the news and publishers made a profit by balancing cost of news gathering and distribution with newspaper revenue. Rather simple model.</p>
<p>In the 70s a new business model entered the publishing industry. Advertising. While the New York Times once stated that they will never have adds&#8230; 20 years later the revenue model for the entire industry was advertising. Charging for the newspaper had nothing to do with revenue but exclusively with the fact that the papers had to report the number of sold circulation to the advertisers.</p>
<p>Then the Internet came to life publishers had a gigantic opportunity: a) The news could reach the subscriber even faster and b) the cost of distribution could go way down at the same time. So if news gathering, journalistic preparation and distribution would be the purpose of a publisher, The Internat would have been a blessing. But at that time publishing wasn&#8217;t about news distribution anymore but about advertising distribution. And the new advertising model wasn&#8217;t too clear to the printing industry.</p>
<p>And as publishers didn&#8217;t really know what their business model is, advertisers went directly to the Internet &#8211; not needing print anymore and the chewed out news world is going out of business.Well &#8211; almost. There are new magazines and some news papers who get this and they are still somewhat alive.</p>
<p>But our world is more than ever thirsty for news, information and updates. All the publishing industry has to do, is to understand that new world, it&#8217;s dynamics and its most likely development in the future. A new model is in the works &#8211; happy to help. </p>
<p>@AxelS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/2009/03/indenvertimescom-launched-how-to-use-twitter-to-generate-buzz-and-land-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-13823</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gemsolv.com/wordpress/?p=849#comment-13823</guid>
		<description>Sheryl, thanks for weighing in. I didn&#039;t realize my cousin had an expert helping, I thought he was just using me.  

Thanks for the plug {grin}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheryl, thanks for weighing in. I didn&#8217;t realize my cousin had an expert helping, I thought he was just using me.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the plug {grin}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

